Posts tagged ‘401k valuation date’

Valuation Dates for QDROS: A Common Mistake in Marital Settlement Agreements

QDRO valuation date: QDRO Helper California QDRO attorneysWHAT IS A “VALUATION DATE” FOR QDRO PURPOSES?

A QDRO (Qualified Domestic Relations Order) is a court order that divides retirement benefits due to divorce.  The valuation date for QDRO purposes is the date as of which the funds are to be divided.  For example, in a QDRO for a 401(k) plan awarding 50% to the non-employee spouse with a valuation date of September 30, 2011, the plan will look at the Participant’s account balance on September 30, 2011 multiply the account by 50% in order to determine the non-employee spouse’s share.  The plan administrator will not look at the current account balance at the time of actual division of the account, but will look at the account balance as of the valuation date.

VALUATION DATE PROBLEMS IN QDROS

Unfortunately, an issue which often makes the QDRO process more difficult is the lack of a valuation date in the parties’ Marital Settlement Agreement (“MSA”).  A missing valuation date can lead to litigation at a later date.  Your MSA should always state the date as of which the benefits are to be divided, or reference a date which is known and agreed to by the parties, i.e. “Wife is awarded 50% of the account balance as of the date of separation” or “Husband is awarded 50% of the account as of December 15, 2012.”  Absent a specified date, one party may argue for the date of separation to be used, while another party may argue that the date of dissolution should be used.  As can be imagined, the value of retirement benefits could vary greatly depending on the valuation date chosen, particularly since the date of separation and the date of dissolution can be more than a year apart.  Other potential valuation dates are the date that a divorce petition is filed, the date the MSA was signed.

Typically, in California, the parties’ date of separation is viewed as the date that the community interest in the asset stops accruing. [In re Marriage of Bergman, 168 Cal. App. 3d 742 (1985)]  However, other states view community property differently.  For example, in Arizona, the accrual of community property typically terminates upon the service of the divorce petition on the other party; in Nevada, community property usually terminates upon the date of divorce.

Valuation dates are also an issue because often with QDROs for defined contribution plans, gains and losses are included in the alternate payee’s share from the valuation date to the date that the plan administrator actually segregates the account.  Therefore, the further back the valuation date is from the date of account segregation, the greater the potential change in value of the alternate payee’s benefits.

If the parties are awarding the non-employee spouse a flat dollar amount, then the valuation date should be the date of account segregation by the plan administrator and the QDRO should specify that the parties do not intend for any gains or losses to be included in the alternate payee’s award.

Provisions should also be made in the event that the retirement plan only allows certain valuation dates.  For example, some plans only allow valuation dates that are the last day of a month, or have valuation dates that can only be days that the New York Stock Exchange allows trading (i.e. excludes weekends or holidays).  Ideally, the MSA should provide a valuation date and then also state “or the nearest valuation date under the Plan”.

The best practice is to ensure that the MSA clearly states the valuation date for dividing retirement assets and also allows for variations due to the valuation dates allowed under the terms of the retirement plan.

QUESTIONS ABOUT VALUATION DATES IN QDROS?

If you have questions about valuation dates in QDROs or if you would like to assistance with your MSA language or drafting your QDRO, please call QDRO Helper at 619-786-QDRO (619-786-7376) or email us at info@qdrohelper.com.

 

DISCLAIMER: ADVERSTISEMENT.  Any legal information on this blog has been prepared by QDRO Helper for informational purposes only and is not legal advice and does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. The information provided is intended to comply with Rule 1-400 of the California Rules of Professional Conduct. Any links in this website are included only to help you locate other Internet resources that may be of interest to you; QDRO Helper is not associated with any such links. The transmission and receipt of information contained on this website via the Internet or e-mail or in any other manner does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship, and you should not act on the information contained herein without obtaining legal counsel. QDRO Helper has a strict policy of entering into attorney-client relationships with its clients only though the execution of a written fee agreement acknowledged by QDRO Helper. As such, you should not send QDRO Helper any confidential information in response to this web page until such a relationship is established and expressly acknowledged by QDRO Helper.

619-786-QDRO / 619-786-7376 (phone) * 619-345-4687 (fax) * 4455 Murphy Canyon Rd. Ste. 100, San Diego, CA 92123 * © The Law Office of Madeline L. Hill, d.b.a. QDRO Helper* All rights reserved.*   ***QDRO Helper is an efficient and affordable service that provides attorney drafted QDROs to individuals and family lawyers throughout California, including San Diego, Los Angeles, Bakersfield, Anaheim, Riverside, San Francisco, San Jose, Oakland, Fresno, and Sacramento. QDRO Helper offers a $500 flat fee QDRO option.*** THE MATERIAL CONTAINED ON THIS WEBSITE MAY BE CONSIDERED AN ADVERTISEMENT IN CALIFORNIA. QDRO Helper’s attorneys are only licensed to practice in the state of California. Any legal information on this website has been prepared by QDRO Helper for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. The content of this website is intended to comply with Rule 1-400 of the California Rules of Professional Conduct. The material posted on this website is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship, and readers should not act upon it without seeking professional counsel. QDRO Helper and its attorneys have a strict policy of entering into attorney-client relationships with its clients only though the execution of a written fee agreement acknowledged by QDRO Helper. Sending an e-mail to QDRO Helper does not create an attorney-client relationship, and none will be formed unless there is an express agreement between the firm and the individual. We strongly advise against sending confidential or privileged information to QDRO Helper until you can establish such a relationship. To the extent the State Bar rules requires us to designate a principal office and/or single attorney responsible for this site, QDRO Helper designates Madeline L. Hill as the attorney responsible for this site.
Wordpress Themes
Scroll to Top